Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on cause of action and
Win your case! LawWeb.in: Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.
Law Web
2024年11月20日 · In the facts of this case, the dispute relating to the transaction of assignment of debt by the Plaintiff No. 1 in favour of the Defendant No.1 not being a dispute arising out of an ordinary transaction of a merchant, financier or a trader, and obviously not a banker nor a dispute arising out of any of the items mentioned in Section 2(1)(c) (ii) to …
Law Web: Supreme court Judgment on essential ingredients of …
2021年12月26日 · CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2010. 13th December 2021. Author: Surya Kant, J. Citation: 2021 ALL SCR (ONLINE) 761 Appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 18th June, 2009 passed by Andhra Pradesh High Court, dismissing his criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 28th March, 2002 of the Special Judge, CBI Cases, Hyderabad whereby he was held guilty of the offences under Sections ...
Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on framing of issues - Law …
2001年1月3日 · 20. In the case at hand, each one of the corrupt practices alleged by the petitioner and denied by the defendant, should have formed the subject matter of a distinct issue sufficiently expressive of the material proposition of fact and of law arising from the pleadings.
Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on Dying Declaration - Law …
2023年11月19日 · Win your case! LawWeb.in: Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.
Leading Supreme Court judgments on injunction - Law Web
2014年2月14日 · “The phrases `prima facie case’, `balance of convenience’ and ` irreparable loss’ are not rhetoric phrases for incantation, but words of width and elasticity, to meet myriad situations presented by man’s ingenuity in given facts and circumstances, but always is hedged with sound exercise of judicial discretion to meet the ends of justice.
Leading Supreme Court judgment on cause of action and
4. Disputes having arisen out of the contract the respondent filed a suit, being original suit No. 302 of 1975, against the appellants in the Court of Subordinate Judge at Salem for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,63,240, claiming to be the balance of the advance remaining in the hands of the appellants and also a sum of Rs. 2,40,000 towards damages.
Law Web: Important Supreme court Judgments of the year 2020
2020年12月18日 · Win your case! LawWeb.in: Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.
Leading Supreme Court Judgment on anticipatory bail - Law …
2020年3月30日 · (1) Consistent with the judgment in Shri Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Ors. v. State of Punjab MANU/SC/0215/1980 : 1980 (2) SCC 565, when a person complains of apprehension of arrest and approaches for order, the application should be based on concrete facts (and not vague or general allegations) relatable to one or other specific offence. The application seeking anticipatory bail should contain ...
Leading judgment of Supreme court on interim mandatory
2018年12月23日 · “16. The relief of interlocutory mandatory injunctions are thus granted generally to preserve or restore the status quo of the last non-contested status which preceded the pending controversy until the final hearing when full relief may be granted or to compel the undoing of those acts that have been illegally done or the restoration of …